ANIL KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. SECONDARY EDU.and ORS.
WRIA/1626/2018 · 2025-10-27
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195538 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195538 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 1626 of 2018 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. October 27, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nagendra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manu Kumar Srivastava (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Anil Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Secondary Edu.And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench