HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11730 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to authority concerned to consider petitioner's claim for providing the entire service benefits treating the initial appointment on 11.05.1993 as substantive and for granting of promotion and pay scales with effect from 11.05.1993 along with consequential benefits. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner has placed reliance on judgment rendered by this Court in Patap Narain Pandey v. State of U.P. & others [Writ Petition No.4031(S/S) of 2001] as well as decision in State of U.P. and others v. Jag Prasad Chaubey rendered in Special Appeal No.191 of 2024. 4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Chairman, Board of Revenue U.P., Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order in the light of aforesaid decisions, in case the same are applicable upon petitioner. 5. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. October 9, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shikha Srivastava, Suneel Kumar Singh Kalhans, Yogesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Yadu Nath Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench