Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195526 (ALL)

TWINKLE PANDEY @ TWINKLE TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/8739/2024 · 2025-11-21

Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8739 of 2024 (2) CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9146 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Since the F.I.R. impugned in both the aforesaid petitions are same, as such, the same are heard together and decided by a common order. 2. Case called out. 3. None appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the aforesaid petitions nor any request for adjournment or pass-over has been made whereas learned A.G.A. for the State is present. 4. Learned A.G.A. on the basis of instructions submits that the charge- sheet no. 249 of 2024 dated 19.12.2024 was forwarded in the matter and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesha Nand Pandey, Mayank Pandey, Vijay Nand Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesha Nand Pandey, Mayank Pandey, Vijay Nand Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Twinkle Pandey @ Twinkle Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Santosh Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) both the aforesaid petitions have lost their efficacy. None is present on behalf of the petitioners to controvert the same. 5. Dismissed accordingly. November 21, 2025 kanhaiya CRLP No. 8739 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench