RAM JANAM VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDUCATION LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/12166/2025 · 2025-10-15
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195522 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195522 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12166 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri G.K.Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Sri Netram, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3 and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs :-
"a. issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding thereby directing the opposite party no.3 to reinstate the services of the petitioner on the post of Itinerant (vision impaired) Teacher and pay regular salary to him, in the interest of justice. b. issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding thereby directing the pposite party no.3 to renew the contract of petitioner for teaching/training of children, in the interest of justice." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation on 23- 09-2025 before the opposite party no. 3/District Basic Education Officer, District-Lakhimpur Kheri and the same is pending consideration. He further submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the opposite party no. 3 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sunil Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Net Ram Ram Janam Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
Learned counsels appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case, the opposite party no. 3/District Basic Education Officer, District- Lakhimpur Kheri, is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 23-09-2025 within a period of two months, in accordance with law, from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. October 15, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 12166 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench