KAMAL SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/10883/2025 · 2025-11-21
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195517 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195517 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10883 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State; Shri Shailendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.403 of 2025, under Section 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 109, 352, 117(2) BNS, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Raebareli.
3. In terms of the FIR allegations were levelled that around 8 to 10 persons came and attacked the brother of the informant and substantial injuries were inflicted on him. The injury report is on record which indicates presence of as many as six injuries. The applicant was not named in the FIR. Subsequently, his name surfaced in the statement of the injury.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the fact that general allegations have been levelled against the accused and one of the co-accused was granted anticipatory bail, the applicant who is in custody since 11.09.2025 and has one minor case of criminal antecedents, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Kamal Srivastava be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Pratap Singh, Amit Chopra, Vivek Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kamal Srivastava .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 21, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 10883 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench