RAJU @ RAJ BAHADUR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/8331/2025 · 2025-10-06
Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195474 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195474 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8331 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State- opposite parties no.1 to 3.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no.4 is hereby dispensed with.
3. By means of this petition, the petitioner has assailed the impugned FIR bearing FIR/Case Crime No.0383 of 2025, under Sections 191 (2), 103 (1) of B.N.S. 2023, Police Station- Kotwali Lalganj, District- Raebareli.
4. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the petitioner may be given liberty to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law and direction may be issued to decide the same with expedition.
5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue and considering the aforesaid request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court of law and if such anticipatory bail application is filed, the same may be heard and disposed of on its own merit. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ankit Mishra, Ankit Tripathi, Rahul Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Raju @ Raj Bahadur .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
6 . The writ petition is disposed of. . (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) October 6, 2025 Anuj Singh CRLP No. 8331 of 2025 2
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench