HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6516 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Ravi Pratap Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Mansi Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Shikhar Anand, the learned counsel for the respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has raised a preliminary objection that State Public Service Tribunal Lucknow has wrongly been impleaded as an opposite party to the petition and the State of U.P. has not been impleaded as an opposite party. 3. Confronted with the aforesaid objection, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the instant application and he seeks liberty to file a fresh petition with correct array of parties. 4. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. November 10, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shikhar Anand (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Dharam Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Pubilc Service Tribunal Lko. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench