Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19545 (AP)

KILARI VENKATA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/13549/2025 · 2025-05-15

Y Lakshmana Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 13549 OF 2025 Between: Kilari Venkata Rao, S/o.Koteswararao, Aged about 37 years, Occ: Cultivation R/o.Basavapuram Village, Mundlamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Darsi Town, Prakasam District. 4. The Station House Officer, Mundlamuru Police Station, Mundlamuru Village and Mandal, Prakasam District. 5. Mothukuru Guravaiah, S/o.Venkateswarlu, Aged about 49 years, Occ; Business, R/o.Basavarapuram Village, Mundlamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. 6. Bavanasi Prabhudasu, S/o.Ramaiah, Aged about 53 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o.Basavarapuram Village, Mundlamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. 7. Sandadi Govindu, S/o.Lingaiah, Aged about 43 years, Occ; Cultivation, R/o.Basavarapuram Village, Mundlamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. 8. Malapati Galaiah, S/o.Ramaiah, Aged about 56 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o.Basavarapuram Village, Mundlamuru Mandal, Prakasam District. 9. Bollepalli Venkateswarlu, S/o.Subbaiah, Aged about 55 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o.Basavarapuram Village, Mundlamuru Mandal,’ Prakasam District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the pirpymstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleaded to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the mature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 4th respondent in insisting and harassing the petitioner's to settle the civil dispute involved in O.S.No.78 of 2025 on the file of the court of Learned Junior Civil Judge, Darsi, Prakasam District at the instance of respondents 5 to 9, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4 respondent not to interfere in any manner into the petitioner civil dispute at the instance of the unofficial respondents 5 to 9 and protect the life and liberty of the petitioner from the respondent 4 at the instance of the respondents 5 to 9. • • may lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4‘^ respondent not to interfere in any manner into the petitioner civil dispute at the instance of the unofficial respondents 5 to 9 and protect the life and liberty of the petitioner from the respondent 4 at the instance of the respondents 5 to 9, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : GP FOR HOME ^ Counsel for the Respondent Nbs.S to 9 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER / APHC010274552025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) hEm; [3521] FRIDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 13549/2025 Between: Kilari Venkata Rao ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR HOME 2 Che Court made the following ORDER:- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioner is that at the behest of the respondent Nos.5 to 9, the 4*'^ respondent-Station House Officer, Mundlamuru Police Station, Prakasam District, is insisting the petitioner to withdraw the O.S.No.78 of 2025 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Darsi, Prakasam District. The 4^^ respondent is not expected to insist the petitioner for withdrawal of any civil suit pending before the competent Court having jurisdiction. Therefore, the 4''" respondent-Station House Officer, Mundlamuru Police Station, Prakasam District, is directed not to insist or give pressure to the petitioner for withdrawal of the civil suit i.e., O.S.No.78 of 2025 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Darsi, Prakasam District. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 2. 3. 4. 5. As a sequel, pending Interlocutory applications, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- K J RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ' SECTION OFFICER To, ^ Secretary to Government, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat. Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Darsi Town Prakasam District. 4. The Station House Officer, Mundlamuru Police Station, Mundlamuru Village and Mandal, Prakasam District. 5. One CC to Sri Naga Praveqn Vankayalapati, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 7. Three C.D. Copies. HIGH COURT DATED:16/05/2025 VACATION COURT ORDER 1! MAY 2025 •* ? Current aecuon . ^sS?«patch®2^ WP.No.13549 of 2025 s. DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS