Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19544 (RAJ)

ISHWAR LAL GUJAR v. STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENTORS

CW/11152/2014 · 2025-03-10

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:10828] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11152/2014 Ishwar Lal Gujar son of Late Harji Gujar, aged about 60 years, resident of Village Daulatganj-Nayagaon, Tehsil Ladpura, District Kota (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through its Principal Secretary, Department of Urban Development & Housing Department, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Director, Local Bodies, Localself Govt. Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur 3. The District Collector, Kota 4. Urban Improvement Trust, Kota through its Secretary 5. Tehsildar, Ladpura, District Kota ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Seema Moyal for Mr. Naseemuddin Quazi For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 10/03/2025 On 22.05.2024, this Court passed the following order:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the land of Khasra No.180, Village Daulatganj @ Naya Gaon was given a new Khasra No.182. However, there is no document on record to substantiate the aforesaid submission. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted a week’s time to substantiate the aforesaid submission by production of relevant document(s). [2025:RJ-JP:10828] (2 of 2) [CW-11152/2014] List the matter on 30.05.2024 as prayed.” On 16.12.2024, time was sought on behalf of the petitioner stating that arguing counsel was not available. This Court, in the interest of justice, granted last opportunity to the petitioner and directed listing of the matter on 10.02.2025. On that date again, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed for and was granted last opportunity of four weeks in terms of the order dated 22.05.2024 and the matter was directed to be listed today. Today also, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for an adjournment. However, in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, no case for adjournment is made out. Since, the petitioner has not been able to substantiate the submission as recorded in the order dated 22.05.2024, this civil writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/23