APHC010273832020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18074/2020 Between: 1. B.KOTI REDDY,, S/O. SAMBI REDDY, AGE 34 YEARS, ID. NO. 4-7, BHAVANAIN VARI PALETRI, PITTALAVANI PALM MANDAI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, AMARAVATI 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, , NALLAPADU P,S., GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 4. K SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O. PUNNAREDDY, AGE 51 YEARS, 5. K VIJAYA, W/O. K.SRINIVASA REDDY, AGE 45 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO. 4 AND 5 ARE RESIDENT OF D.NO. 8-3- 318/6/3/20, ELLAREDDYGUDA, KHAIRATABAD, HYDERABAD ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent interfering with Petitioners' life, liberty and civil disputes at the instance of 4th Respondent between the Respondents No. 4 and 5 with petitioner as illegal, 2 arbitrary, violative of Art. 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and principles of natural justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents and its sub-ordinates not to interfere with the Petitioners’ life, liberty and in civil disputes pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent interfering with Petitioners' life, liberty and civil disputes at the instance of 4th Respondent between the Respondents No. 4 and 5 with petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Art. 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and principles of natural justice and pass....…” 2. None represented for the petitioner. 3. None represented for the petitioner. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions, would submit that on receipt of spandana complaint from the unofficial respondent, the petitioner was called for preliminary enquiry and no crime has been registered against the petitioner and the spandana application was closed, since it is a matter of civil in nature. 4. Recording the submissions of learned Assistant Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of. However the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 13.08.2025 MH 4 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 128 W.P.No.18074 of 2020 Dated: 13.08.2025 MH