HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10485 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner has made following main prayer: "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned notice dated 30.03.2025 issued by opposite party no.2, Annexure No. 1 to this petition, in the interest of justice." 3. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, it appears that there is a remedy of appeal under the Electricity Act, 2003. 4. In light of the same, we do not see it a fit case to interfere. 5. The petitioner is at liberty to file an appeal in accordance with law. 6. In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of. November 10, 2025 Anupam S/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sarvesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Aprajita Bansal (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Rohit Awasthi .....Petitioner(s) Managing Director Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench