Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195430 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD AKIL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. PRIN, SECY. HOME LKO

BAIL/6743/2025 · 2025-10-15

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6743 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and Shri Rajneesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.186 of 2023, under Sections 304B, 498A, IPC and Sections 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Dubagga, District Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the FIR in question was lodged alleging that the daughter of the informant was married to the applicant. Subsequently she was killed on account of non payment of dowry. The cause of death as per the post mortem report is ante mortem hanging. The co accused have been enlarged on bail. The applicant is the husband who was in Saudi Arabia at the time of the incident. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the post mortem report, the fact that the applicant was in Saudi Arabia at the time of incident and there being nothing specific against the applicant of having caused physical or mental harassment of the deceased before her death with regard to demand of dowry, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 28.4.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohemmed Amir Naqvi, Amjad Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Rajneesh Kumar Pandey, Vinod Kumar Mohammad Akil .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin, Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Let the applicant Mohammad Akil be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 15, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 6743 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench