Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195424 (ALL)

MOHD. ISHAK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

A227/7359/2025 · 2025-12-19

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7359 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 to 5 and Shri Raj Priya Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent no.6. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondent no. 7 is dispensed with. 3. By means of present writ petition the petitioner made the following reliefs:- "I. Issue an order or direction directing opposite party no. 5 to submit his report in respect of the proceedings under Sections 32 and 38 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, before the competent court of opposite party no.3. II. Issue an order or direction direction directing opposite party no.2 to 4 to stop the illegal encroachment of opposite party no.7 destroying the sanctity of the ancestral cemetery of the petitioner." 4. Prayer made by the petitioner for registering the case under Section 32 and 38 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that the case has already been registered as Computer Case No. T-202504040312297. 6. In light of the above, the petition is consigned and no further direction Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shri Kishan Prajapati, Dhruv Ashish Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Raj Priya Srivastava Mohd. Ishak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) is required. 7. The petition is consigned to record. 8. Written instruction is taken on record. December 19, 2025 Muk A227 No. 7359 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench