RAKHA RAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. AND ORS.
WRIA/15997/2018 · 2025-12-18
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195423 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195423 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15997 of 2018 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State, Dr. Uday Veer Singh, counsel for respondent no. 3 and Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, counsel for respondent no. 2 are present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 18, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Srivastava, Shailendra Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Kumar, Vindhyawashni Kumar (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Rakha Ram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench