SURAJ PRATAP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. U.P. BASIC SIKSHA and OTHERS ALLAHA
WRIA/28678/2017 · 2025-11-10
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195421 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195421 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 28678 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 10, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Tauseef Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Net Ram, Sandeep Kumar Yadav (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Suraj Pratap .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. U.P. Basic Siksha And Others Allaha .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench