Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195415 (ALL)

ARSH SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. GOVT. OF U.P. CIVIL SECTT. LKO AND OTHERS

CRLP/6636/2023 · 2025-11-14

Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6636 of 2023 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the bar that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and petitioner has been exonerated and, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned AGA for the State does not dispute the aforesaid fact. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 14, 2025 kkv/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vaibhav Mishra, Prabhakar Trivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Arsh Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Govt. Of U.P. Civil Sectt. Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench