Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19541 (PNJ)

SHASHI ADLAKHA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CRM-M/7538/2021 · 2025-09-04

Vinod S Bhardwaj

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 244-6 CRM-M-7538-2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 04.09.2025 Shashi Adlakha ...Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Addl. A.G. Haryana. Mr. Himanshu Arora, Advocate for respondent No.5. Mr. Pankaj Bajaj, Advocate for Mr. Munish Kapila, Advocate for respondent No.6. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed for issuance of direction that all the sentences imposed upon the petitioner in different criminal cases be ordered to run concurrently. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the present petition has been rendered infructuous since petitioner- Smt. Shashi Adlakha has passed away in the meanwhile. Aforesaid statement is not disputed by the opposite counsel. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous All pending misc. application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 04.09.2025 JUDGE Mangal Singh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MANGAL SINGH 2025.09.05 13:46 I am the author of this document