Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010213672024
2025:GAU-AS:3701
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2740/2024 SAIFUL ISLAM AND 12 ORS.
S/O INTAZ ALI R/O NO. 2, LANGIA, P.S. DHING, DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM 2: AIJUL ISLAM @ AZIZUL ISLAM S/O SAIFUL ISLAM R/O NO. 2 LANGIA
P.S. DHING
DIST. NAGAON ASSAM 3: IJAJUL ISLAM @ IZIZUL ISLAM S/O SAIFUL ISLAM R/O NO. 2 LANGIA
P.S. DHING
DIST. NAGAON ASSAM 4: NAZIRUL ISLAM S/O SAIFUL ISLAM R/O NO. 2 LANGIA
P.S. DHING
DIST. NAGAON
Page No.# 2/4 ASSAM 5: MAZIDUL ISLAM S/O SAIFUL ISLAM R/O NO. 2 LANGIA
P.S. DHING
DIST. NAGAON ASSAM 6: ABDUL KADIR S/O ABDUL HEKIM R/O NO. 2 LANGIA
P.S. DHING
DIST. NAGAON ASSAM 7: HABIJUDDIN @ HABEZ ALI S/O ABDUL BAREK R/O NO. 2 LANGIA
P.S. DHING
DIST. NAGAON ASSAM 8: AMRAJUL HAQUE @ IMDADUL ISLAM S/O HABIJUDDIN R/O NO. 2 LANGIA
P.S. DHING
DIST. NAGAON ASSAM 9: RAMJAN ALI @ RAMJAN MUBARAQ HUSSAIN S/O HABIJUDDIN R/O NO. 2 LANGIA
P.S. DHING
Page No.# 3/4
DIST. NAGAON ASSAM 10: INTAZ ALI S/O UNKNOWN R/O JAAMBASTI P.S. DHING
DIST. NAGAON ASSAM 11: INAMUL HAQUE S/O INTAZ ALI R/O JAAM BASTI P.S. DHING
DIST. NAGAON ASSAM 12: ABU CHAHID S/OLATE UMED ALI R/O NO. 2 LANGIYA P.S. DHING
DIST. NAGAON ASSAM 13: MUHAMMAD ALI S/O UNKNOWN R/O DUBALAMARI CHAPORI P.S. DHING
DIST. NAGAON ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R GOSWAMI, MS S DAS,MS. N DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MOTIUR RAHMAN (INFORMANT)
Page No.# 4/4
BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
ORDER 28.03.2025
Learned counsel Mr R Goswami, is present on behalf of the petitioners.
2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Mr D P Goswami, appearing on behalf of the respondent State, has submitted that charge sheet has been laid against the petitioners vide CS No. 230/2024, dated 29.12.2024.
3. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to appear before the learned jurisdictional Court/Elaka Magistrate, within 20 days from today and apply for bail, which may be considered by the learned Court, in accordance with law.
4. Till then, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners.
5. Matter is closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant