AMBUJ SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1510/2025 · 2025-10-15
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195401 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195401 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1510 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State as well as Ms. Shivani, learned Advocate who has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant which is taken on record. Learned A.G.A. submits that the applicant has impleaded the victim by name, which is prohibited under Section 72 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. It is further submitted that Section 69 of the BNS has also been added against the applicant. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application with liberty to file a fresh bail application. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. The Office is directed to return the certified copies of the documents filed along with the bail application to the learned counsel for the applicant. October 15, 2025 R.C. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bharat Kumar Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Ambuj Shukla .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench