YOGENDRA SINGH and ANR. v. STATE OF U.P.THRU PRIN.SECY.BASIC EDUCATION LKO and ORS.
WRIA/239/2020 · 2025-12-10
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195399 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195399 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 239 of 2020 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 10, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Durga Prasad Shukla, Shashi Bajpai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shivam Sharma (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Yogendra Singh And Anr. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Education Lko And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench