Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195398 (ALL)

SMT. UJAMA BEGAM v. STATE OF U.P.THRU PRIN.SECY. PANCHAYATI RAJ LKO and ORS.

WRIC/10283/2021 · 2025-10-27

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10283 of 2021 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising her grievances the petitioner has filed the representation, a copy of which is annexure-8 to the petition, before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 3. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.2 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, the respondent No.2, District Magistrate/ Collector, Unnao, is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 27, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Smt. Nalini Prakash Jain Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Smt. Ujama Begam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy. Panchayati Raj Lko And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench