KARAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. BARABANKI AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1519/2025 · 2025-10-15
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195393 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195393 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1519 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case, and only a general allegation of assault has been made against him. Learned A.G.A., on the other hand, contends that it is not a case of false implication. Six persons sustained injuries in the incident, and the injured witnesses have supported the prosecution version. Perused the record. From a perusal of the material on record, it appears that six persons were injured in the occurrence. The investigation is still in progress, and the statements of the injured witnesses corroborate the prosecution case. The complicity of the applicant is, therefore, prima facie established, and it cannot be treated as a case of false implication. Custodial interrogation of the applicant may be required. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed. October 15, 2025/R.C. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dhananjai Kumar Tripathi, Devendra Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Karan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Barabanki And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench