Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19536 (AP)

CHAKALI VARA PRASAD @ PRASAD v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/5646/2025 · 2025-06-26

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

r= ]N THE HIGH COURT-OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAT!j;=vj: FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWOTHOUSANDANDTWENTY FIVE / =PRESENT: T;l#rfONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5646 OF 2025 Between : REDDY Chakali Vara Prasad @ Prasad, S/o Chakali Ramanjineyulu, 38 yrs, N/o Chinthalapalli village, Dharmavaram mandaI, now R/o H.No.4-2-639, Somanatha Nagar Colony, Ananthapuramu. Pet:itioner/Accused AND 1. The State ofAndhra Pradesh, Represented by CID through its Special Public Prosecutor, High Court ofAndhra Pradesh, Amaravati. 2. The State ofAndhra Pradesh, Represented by Public Prosecutor, (Bathalapalli P.S., Ananthapuramu) High Court ofAndhra Pradesh, ;rf~ Amaravati Respondents Petition under Sections 482 of BNSS (old 438 of Cr.P.C), prayI-ng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Crl-minaI Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant antI-CiPatOry bail in the even of arrest in Station. ction with Crime No. 56 of 2021 of Bathalapalli Police The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of sri ARRABOLU SAI NAVEEN, Advocate for the Petitioner and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent No.2 and the Court made the following; APHCO10274782025 EELE IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY £BurINAL PETITION NO: 5646,2LQ2§ Betwee n : Chakali Vara Prasad @ Prasad .mPETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and H.RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Others Counsel for the petitioner/accused: 1.ARRABOLU SAI NAVEEN Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(s): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court macle the following: ORDER: The Criminal Petition, under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is filed on behalf of the petitioner/A7 to grant anticipatory bail in connection wI'th Crime No.56/2021 of Bathalapalli Police Station, Anantapur District. 6 -------- i=J(# Z` ._I 2. A case has been registered against the peti{I-Oner and others for the offence punishable under section 420 read with 34 IPC. 3. Case of the prosecut]-on jn brI-ef jS that prior to 15.4.2021 jn sanjeevapuram vI-Ilage, Bathalapalli MandaI, Al to A3, who are the agents of EBIDD F,'nancial Traders company, Anantapur for whf-ch A4 I-S the Manager, took an amount of more than Rs.1.00 crore from some members jncludI-ng the defacto complainant, and cheated them and failed {o return back the amount, Basing on the report of the defacto complaint, a case was registered against.the peti{I-Oner and others. 4. Heard learned counsel for the pe{I-tI-Oner and learned Assistant public Prosecutor for respondent-state. perused the record. 5. Learned Assistant publI-C Prosecutor submits that the court may Pass appropriate Orders. 6. A perusal of the materI~al available on record goes to show that, basing on the confessional statement of co-accused, name of the petitioner was saI'd tO be figured in the F.I.R.. There is no reference to the pe{j{joner's name I'n the First Information Report. ln vI-eW Of the facts and cl'rcumstances of the case, this court I'S inclined to consider the prayer of the petI'tiOner for grant of antjcipatory bail. 7. Accordingly, I-n the event of his arrest with regard to thI-S Cr['me, petitI'Oner/A7 shall be released on bail on hI'S eXeCut]'ng a personal bond •L/ u <-`--` for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) wI'th two SuretI-eS for the like sum each {o the satisfaction of the arresting police offI'Cials and also on condition that the petj{ioner shall make himself available for investigation as and when required and that he sha" not cause any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses. The petitioner sha" appear before the station House offI-Cer concerned, once I'n a Week i.e. on every Sunday between 10.00 am and 05.00 pm, till filing of the charge-sheet. 8. Accordingly, the criminal petjtI'On iS allowed. SD/-K. KASIRAO ACHAR! //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Pr'lncipal District & Sessions Judge, Ananthapuramu 2. The Station House Officer, Bathalapalli Police Station Ananthapuramu District. 3. One CC to SRl. ARRABOLU SAI NAVEEN Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court ofAP [OUT] 5. One spare copy KJ i} HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED :27/06/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.5646 of 2025 ALLOWED o1 \uL \\& a ='