KSHITIZ RASTOGI and OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY.HOME. LKO and ANOTHER
A482/5742/2021 · 2025-10-07
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195355 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195355 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5742 of 2021 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list.
2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicants. Whereas, Shri Rajdeep Singh, learned AGA-I on behalf of the State-opposite party is present.
3. In view of the above, the present application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
October 7, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Brijesh Kumar Vishwakarma, Hari Nath Singh, Karnika Singh, Nitin Kumar Agnihotri, Sunil Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ganga Shanker Gupta, Prateek Tewari (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Kshitiz Rastogi And Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy.Home. Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench