Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195341 (ALL)

RAMASANKAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVL SECTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

CRLA/3357/2025 · 2025-10-16

Manjive Shukla

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3357 of 2025 Court No. - 27 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State. 2. The captioned criminal appeal has been filed challenging therein, the order dated 10.06.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge (SC/ST) Act, Ambedkar Nagar in Sessions Trial No.182 of 2025, whereby the appellant had been summoned to face trial for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) of B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act, Police Station-Maharua, District-Ambedkar Nagar. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant, at the very outset, has submitted that the appellant intends to surrender before the trial court and shall file an application for grant of bail. He has further submitted that this Court may direct the trial court to consider and decide the appellant's application for bail in the light of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its judgment rendered in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State does not have any objection if the aforesaid limited prayer is allowed in favour of the appellant. 5. In view of the aforesaid submissions, this criminal appeal is disposed of Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Shravan Kumar, Alok Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ramasankar Singh .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civl Sectt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) with liberty to the appellant to surrender before the trial court concerned and file an application for bail within a period of four weeks from today and if such application is filed, the trial court is hereby directed to consider and decide the said application, expeditiously keeping in view the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (supra). It is further provided that for the period of four weeks, no coercive measures shall be taken against the appellant. October 16, 2025 Renu/- CRLA No. 3357 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench