Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195333 (ALL)

ADARSH SRIVASTAV @ RAHUL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/1982/2024 · 2025-10-27

Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1982 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Case called out. None is present for the petitioner. 2. This Court had passed the following order on 28.03.2024:- "Heard. By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of F.I.R. dated 27.12.2023 bearing Case Crime/FIR No.0218/2023, for the offence under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B I.P.C., registered at Police Station Harraiya, District Balrampur. Contention raised by the petitioner's counsel is that he is a Bank Mitra and as he is not an employee of the bank therefore, he has no hand in the commission of the crime as alleged but has been falsely implicated. However, learned AGA says that the allegation is of misappropriation of money deposited by the bank's customers. The informant, has evidence to show that he had deposited Rs.95,000/- in his bank with the Indian Bank, Harraiya and entry in this regard was also made in his passbook but subsequently, the bank denied deposit of the said money. It is alleged in the FIR that there are other bank customers, who have been similarly duped, their names and account numbers have also been given. It is specifically mentioned in the FIR that the petitioner and other gang members are operating in connivance with each other to dupe bank customers. In view of the aforesaid, this is not a case where FIR should be quashed. Petitioner can avail other Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girdhari Lal Shukla, Seeta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Adarsh Srivastav @ Rahul .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) remedies. However, we find that almost three months have lapsed since filing of the FIR. Let AGA seek instructions as to the evidence if any collected against the petitioner. Put up on 01.04.2024, as fresh." 3. Learned AGA, on the basis of instructions dated 13.10.2025, received from Harish Singh, S.H.O., Police Station Haraiya, District Balrampur, which has been placed before this Court and taken on record, submits that the charge sheet under Section 409/420/467/468/471/120(B) and 34 IPC has been prepared and forwarded to the Court against the accused including the petitioner, therefore this petition has lost it's efficacy. 4. Dismissed accordingly. October 27, 2025 Akanksha Sri/- CRLP No. 1982 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench