Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195330 (ALL)

VIJAY KUMAR AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/9883/2025 · 2025-11-21

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9883 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Sri Mukhtar Ahmad, Advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed mainly with the prayer to quash the entire proceeding of Charge sheet no. Nill/2016, dated 14.08.2016 in Criminal Case no. 1501/2016, arising our N.C.R. no. 0060/2016, U/s 323/504 I.P.C, Police Station Asoha, District Unnao, styled as State........Vs......... Vijay Kumar and other, Pending before Learned Civil Judge as Contained in (Senior Division)/F.T.C Unnao ANNEXURE no. 1 to this Application. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which said to have been taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No. 3 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the parties concerned to appear before the trial court concerned within 2 weeks from today alongwith original compromise and the trial court is directed to verify the compromise within next 6 weeks. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Salman, S. Asan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mukhtar Ahamad Vijay Kumar And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of three month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if it has been filed, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. November 21, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 9883 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench