Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19533 (HP)

MADAN LAL v. STATE OF HP AND ORS

CWP/8124/2022 · 2025-08-26

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:HHC:28848-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 8124 of 2022 Decided on: 26.08.2025 Madan Lal … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajpal Thakur, Additional Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocate for respondents No. 4 and 5. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a direction to the respondents to ensure that Annexure P-2 that has been passed by the Authority in the proceedings initiated against the private respondents under Section 163 of the H.P. Land Revenue Act is implemented in letter and spirit. 2. Learned Counsel for respondents No. 4 and 5 states that as per his instructions, some encroachment has already been removed. 3. The Court asked learned Counsel for the respondents as 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:28848-DB to whether the order passed by the Authority has been complied with in letter and spirit, the answer is in the negative. 3. In light of the fact that as there is an order of eviction against the private respondents from the government land, the Authorities are bound to implement said order of eviction and in case, same has not been implemented till date, let the same be implemented positively within a period of three months from today. The writ petition is disposed of in above terms, so also pending miscellaneous applications, if any. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 26, 2025 (narender)