_-----=> MONDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: [3327] lNTHEHIGHCOURTOFANDHRAPRADESHATAMARAVATl ,_ _ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY¥l CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5619 OF 2025 Betwee n : 1. Peyyala Rajeswar @ Rajeswar Peyyala, S/o Peyyala John Raj, Aged about 45 years R/o D.No.4-14/1, Rajavole Village, Rajamahendravaram Rural Manda[, East Godavari District. 2. Molugu Lakshmanadithya Venugopal @ Venugopal Mulugu, S/o M.A.V.L.N Acharyulu, aged about 46 years, R/o D.No.1-62, Rajavole village, Rajamahendravaram Rural Mandal, East Godavari District. 3. Bagaru Jithendra @ Jithendra Bagaru, S/o Apparao, aged about 47 years, R/o D.No.45-12-56, ThadilthOta, Rajamahendravaram East Godavari District. Petitioner/Accused AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by the Public Prosecutor Through s.H.O, Rajanagaram Police Station, East Godavari District. 2. Putta Ramayya Chowdari, S/oo Veerraju, Aged about 90 years, R/o. valluru village, Kapileswarapuram MandaI, Dr. B R Ambedkar Konaseema District, Andhra Pradesh. •,,;.I:,.:I-:a,3 J*`€`'`. `+\` -+ / Respondent No.2 js I.mpleaded as per the court order dated 23.06.2025 in I.A.No.1 of2025 I'n Crl.P.No.5619 of2025. Respondent/complaI-nant petI'tiOn under Sectl'on petition under section 482 of BNSS., is filed * I. praying that I-n the circumstances stated in the grounds fl'Ied in support of the petjtl'on, the HI'gh Court may be pleased to of cr.p.c, praying that I'n the circumstances stated jn the affidavit filed l'n support of the criminal Petitl'on, the Hl|gh Court may be pleased to release the petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3, on ba" I'n the event of their arrest I-n connection wj{h crime No.178 of 2025, on the fI'Ie of Rajanagaram police Stall-On, East Godavari District couNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER .-SRI. I V JAGGI REDDY couNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT .I PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER The Criminal Petl-lion, under section 482 of the BNSS, I-s fI-led on behalf of the petitioners herein/Accused Nos.1 {o 3 to grant anticI-PatOry bail in connection with crI-me No.178 of 2025 of Rajanagaram police Station, East Godavari District, regi-stered for the offences punishable under sections 318(4), 336(3) and 340(2) read with 3(5) of the BNS. 2. Case of the Prosecution, in brief, iS that On 28.04.2025, the defacto compla-lnant filed a report before the police alleging that he inherited land to an extent of Ac.27.56 cents in Survey No.191 of Rajanagaram Mandal, Namavaram V-lllage from his ancestors-, that out of the said extent, Ac.7.56 cents Of land Was Subd-lVided for construction of a hospital and the land was leveled with gravel and' a room was constructed; that the accused conspired together to acquire Ac.5.00 cents of land, fraudulently Procured Stamp Papers with old dates and alleged to have forged the s'lgnature of the de facfo complainant and brought into existence a Purchase Agreement, dated 01.01.2024; that on ll.03.2025, a notice Was got issued to the cJe fac£o comPlainant Stating that the de faCfo complainant was alleged to have executed an Agreement at the rate of Rs.75.00 lakhs and a Sum Of Rs.60.00 lakhs was given towards advance. 3. ` Heard learned COunSel for the Petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondent No.2. Perused the record. 4. A perusal Of material On record goes tO Show that the Only accusation as aga-lnst the petitioners is that they were alleged to have entered into an Agreement Of Sale with defaCtO COmPlainant for an extent of land Ac.5.00 cents in Survey No.191 of Namavaram village, Rajanagaram Mandal. The case of Prosecution iS that the signatures of defacto complainant on the said agreement are forged and on coming to know the same, a civ'll suit was filed and the same ¢l.i, s--?9 is pendI'ng before the competent court. Thereafter, the defacto compla[-nant filed the report as against the petitI'OnerS herein. 5. In vI-eWOfthefacts and cI-rCumStanCeS Of the case and sI-nee a civ" suit is already pending before the competent court, thI-S Court feels that the prayer of the petitioners for grant of antjcipatory ba" can be considered, however, on conditions. 6. Accordingly, jn the event of the arrest of the petitI-Oners/accused Nos.1 {o 3 in the above said crI-me, they sha" be released on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties for the lI'ke Sum to the sa{isfactjon of the arresting police offl'cl'als and also on condjtjon that the petitioners shall make themselves aval'Iable for jnvestjgatjon as and when requI'red and that they sha" not cause any threat, inducement or prom[-se to the prosecution witnesses. The petitioners shall appear before the station House officer concerned, once in a week I'.e., On every Sunday between 10.00 AM and 1.00 PM till fill-ng Of the charge sheet. 7'. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. SD/-M.SR]N[VAS ASSISTANesGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER a 1i\ ForA To, 1. The S.H.O, Rajanagaram Police Station, East Godavari District. 2. Putta Ramayya Chowdari, S/o. Veerraju, Aged about 90 years, R/o. Valluru Village, Kapileswarapuram MandaI, Dr. B R Ambedkar Konaseema District, Andhra Pradesh. (by RPAD) 3. One CC to SRI. T V JAGGI REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court ofAndhra Pradesh [OUT 5. One spare copy \ HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED..07/07/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.5619 of 2025 ALLOWED 4 0 JULZOZ5