Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195324 (ALL)

2025, RAUNAHI, AYODHYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/9394/2025 of COMPLAINANT/INFORMANT IN CASE CRIME NO.-398 · 2025-10-09

Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9394 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed on behalf of opposite party no.6 by Shri Chandan Srivastava, Advocate, is taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Ankit Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri Chandan Srivastava, learned Counsel for the opposite party no.6. 3. This petition has been filed with following prayers :- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2 to 4 to take proper legal action against opposite party no.6 involved in the said incident in pursuance of First Information Report registered as F.I.R. no.: 0398/2025 (contained as Annexure No.1), Under section: 70 BNS 2023 & Section 7 & 8 POCSO Act, 2012, police station Raunahi District-Ayodhya in the interest of justice. (ii) To issue a writ order, direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2 & 3 to ensure fair and and transfer of investigation in the aforesaid FIR and be further directed to arrest the culprits, in the interest of justice." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R. was lodged on Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ankit Singh, Amit Kumar Rai, Subodh Mani Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Complainant/Informant In Case Crime No.-398 Of 2025, Raunahi, Ayodhya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 11.09.2025, but till date, investigation has not been concluded. 5. Per contra, learned A.G.A. for the State, on the basis of instructions, submits that the investigation is going on. He further submits that the investigation shall be concluded, expeditiously. 6. In view of above, this petition is disposed of with direction to the S.S.P., Ayodhya to ensure that the investigation is concluded expeditiously, failing which, the petitioner shall have liberty to approach the concerned Magistrate in view of judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of Sakiri Vasu vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others; (2008) 2 SCC 409. October 9, 2025 Ajit CRLP No. 9394 of 2025 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench