Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195312 (ALL)

RAGHAVRAM GIRI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/9887/2025 · 2025-10-16

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9887 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.237 of 2024, under Sections 80(2), 85 BNS and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.S. Laliya District- Balrampur. 3. It has been argued that similarly situated co-accused have already been enlarged on bail vide orders dated 08.10.2025 and 07.10.2025 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.1224/2025 and 1126 of 2025, respectively. It is further argued that the applicant who is the husband of the victim was not even present at home at the time of alleged incident. Therefore, he may also be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the co-accused have already been granted bail coupled with the fact that the applicant is in jail since 23.11.2024 having no criminal history, he is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Raghavram Giri be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajat Pratap Singh, Abhishek Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Raghavram Giri .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 16, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 9887 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench