HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10023 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the application dated September 24, 2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid application before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.4 should be directed to take decision on the aforesaid application of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.4/ Superintendent of Police, Pratapgarh is directed to take decision on the aforesaid application of the petitioner. 6. We make it clear that the property has been demarcated in compliance of the order dated December 20, 2021 passed by the High Court in Writ Petition No.28576 (M/B) of 2021 in re: Shankar Lal vs. State of U.P. and others. 7. In light of the same, we expect that the police authorities shall Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manuvendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shankar Lal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) ensure that no private parties carry out any interference or disturbance in the property of the petitioner. 8. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 28, 2025 cks/- WRIC No. 10023 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench