MANSI KASHYAP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO
BAIL/9515/2025 · 2025-10-07
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195265 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195265 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9515 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in F.I.R./Case Crime No. 508 of 2025, under Section 108 B.N.S., Police Station Kotwali City, District Hardoi.
3. The F.I.R. in question was lodged alleging that the brother of the informant was married to the applicant around three years ago and there used to be altercation in between them. The allegation of physical harassment at the instance of the applicant were also levelled, it was stated that around two months ago, substantial injuries were caused to the brother of informant and he was asked to go and die subsequently, the brother of the informant committed suicide and the postmortem report, which is on record, indicates ligature mark and no other injury on the body.
4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the material on record, primafacie, the averments for suicide apparently missing, the applicant is a lady aged about 22 years and she is in custody since 02.09.2025 and has no criminal antecedents, as such, she is enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant- Mansi Kashyap be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on her furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs. 20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Apoorv Srivastava, Deeksha Jaiswal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mansi Kashyap .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 7, 2025 Praveen BAIL No. 9515 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench