Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195259 (ALL)

SANDEEP DIXIT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

BAIL/7590/2025 · 2025-11-14

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7590 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 321 of 2024, under sections 103(1), 351(3) BNS, P.S. Ajgain, District Unnao. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that the applicant was coercing his father to sell his share of land which was being refused as such the applicant who is brother of informant committed murder of his own father. Subsequently the informant in his statement stated that the applicant was in the state of intoxication and he committed the offence which was allegedly seen by the witness. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that no allegations of the informant being eye witness was stated in the FIR and in the subsequent statement it was stated that the applicant was allegedly in the state of intoxication as well as considering the argument of applicant that the applicant would be entitled for claiming the benefit of there being no eye witness and the applicant allegedly being in the state of intoxication at the time of incident , however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 20.10.2024 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Bhooshan, O.P. Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sandeep Dixit .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Let the applicant Sandeep Dixit be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 14, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 7590 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench