Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010213072025
2025:GAU-AS:13186
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3165/2025 SRI ABDUL SOHID S/O MD. NUR ISLAM RESIDENT OF VILL- NO. 2 BORJARANI, BONGALI BASTI, P.S. GINGIA, DIST. BISWANATH, ASSAM, PIN-784184. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A A R KARIM, MD S A MONDAL,MR. A DEB,Ms. R. R. BORAH Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER 24.09.2025
Heard Mr. A.A.R. Karim, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. N. Das, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. Page No.# 2/3 By this application the petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Gingia P.S Case No. 106/2025 registered under Section 329(3)/296/75(2)/351(2) of the BNS, 2023. The FIR dated 06.09.2025 lodged by the victim reveals that the petitioner called her over her mobile phone on 26.08.2025 and by threatening her came to her house and that at around 12 PM midnight, the petitioner reached her house and when she opened the door of her house, the petitioner gave her some bad signal and that when she started shouting, the petitioner fled away from the place. Mr. A.A.R. Karim, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the story narrated in the FIR is a concocted one and that the victim called him to her place. The learned counsel also submits that there is a delay of 11 days in lodging the said FIR. Ms. N. Das, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor however submits that the allegation made in the FIR is of serious nature inasmuch as, the petitioner reached the place of the victim at midnight when her husband was absent and gave her unpleasant signal and as such, has prayed for calling of the Case Diary. Heard the counsels and have seen the FIR as well as the connected papers. It is noticed that in the said FIR, the victim apart from stating that the petitioner came to her house and gave her some bad signal, no other allegation has been
Page No.# 3/3 mentioned in the same. In view of the submissions made at the bar and in view of the contents of the FIR, this Court finds it fit to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.
20,000/- with one (1) local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Biswanath with the following conditions:- (1) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and appear before the concerned Court as and when called for. (2) The petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or influence any of the witnesses. (3) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the learned CJM, Biswanath without the permission of the said Court. Petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant