HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8994 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s), learned Counsel for the opposite party no.2, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The instant application has been filed for the following main relief:- "WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may very graciously be pleased to set aside / quash the order of cognizance and summoning dated 19.04.2023, passed by the learned Special Judge S.C. S.T. Act, Lucknow, in Session Case No.- 1969/2023 (State Vs. Suraj Singh Yadav & Others) and Charge Sheet dated 17.04.2022, being Charge Sheet No. 01, alongwith entire proceedings of the aforesaid Session Case No.- 1969/2023 (State Vs. Suraj Singh Yadav & Others), arising out of F.I.R. / Crime No.- 0033 of 2022, under section 147, 353, 504, 506 of The Indian Penal Code, 1860, and section 3(2)(va) of The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, registered at Police Station Chinhat, District Lucknow, pending before the learned Special Judge S.C./S.T. Act, Lucknow, as contained in Annexure Nos. 1 and 2 respectively to this application, in view of the compromise between the parties." Learned counsel for the applicant(s) submitted that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Diwakar Singh Gautam Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Suraj Singh @ Suraj Singh Yadav And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) be ascertained by the Trial Court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Considering the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of finally in following terms:- (i) The parties to the proceedings i.e. Session Case No.- 1969/2023 (supra), shall appear before the concerned Court within six weeks' from today and file the compromise. (ii) If the parties appear before the concerned Court in terms of above, the concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record. (iii) The concerned Court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within two weeks' from the date of production of copy of this order. (iv) The concerned Court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed. (v) It shall be open to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. (vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise, if any, to the Counsel for the applicant(s), after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned court. (vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. October 17, 2025 Jyoti/- A482 No. 8994 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench