Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19522 (CHH)

RAMANAND SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2868/2025 · 2025-04-28

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 5 2025:CGHC:19010 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2868 of 2025 1 Ramanand Sahu S/o Hamir Ram Sahu Aged About 56 Years Posted And Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Swami Atmanand Govt. Utkrisht Hindi Madhyam H.S. School Hatkeshwar, Block- Dhamtari, Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) 2 Navin Kumar Khare S/o Rajendra Lal Khare Aged About 56 Years Posted And Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Govt. H.S. School Khartuli, Block- Dhamtari, Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) 3 Tek Ram Sinha S/o Kanwal Singh Sinha Aged About 49 Years Posted And Working As Head Lecturer (L.B.) At Govt. H.S. School Piperchhedi, Block- Balod, Distt.- Balod (C.G.) 4 Ashwani Kumar Thakur S/o Shobha Ram Thakur Aged About 41 Years Posted And Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Kosmi, Block- Doni Lohara, Distt.- Balod (C.G.) 5 Smt. Shobha Dubey W/o Deepak Dubey Aged About 51 Years Posted And Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Govt. H.S. School Shankerdah, Block- Dhamtari, Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) 6 Rohit Kumar Dewangan S/o Late Ram Khilawan Dewangan Aged About 56 Years Posted And Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Govt. H.S. School Shankerdah, Block- Dhamtari, Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.04.29 10:59:28 +0530 2 / 5 7 Rajesh Kumar S/o Brij Lal Aged About 40 Years Posted And Working As Head Master At Govt. Primary School Dondi Lohara, Block- Dondi Lohara, Distt.- Balod, C.G.) 8 Ajeet Kumar Dhruw S/o Santram Dhruw Aged About 54 Years Posted And Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Govt. H.S. School Dahi, Block- Dhamtari, Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) 9 Devendra Kumar Bhardwaj S/o Late Punit Ram Bhardwaj Aged About 51 Years Posted And Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Dr. Hajari Lal Jain Govt. H.S. School Gopalpuri, Block- Dhamtari, Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) 10 Rajendra Kumar Sahu S/o Mohan Lal Sahu Aged About 54 Years Posted And Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Govt. High School Bagtarai, Block- Gurur, Distt.- Balod (C.G.) 11 Chaindas Ratre S/o Sukulji Ratre Aged About 52 Years Posted And Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Govt. H.S. School Khartuli, Block- Dhamtari, Distt.- Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 / 5 4 Joint Director, Durg, Division Durg (C.G.) 5 District Education Officer, Balod, District Balod (C.G.) 6 District Education Officer, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) 7 Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Balod, District Balod (C.G.) 8 Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) 9 Block Education Officer, Block Dondi Lohara, District Balod (C.G.) 10 Block Education Officer, Block Gurur, District Balod (C.G.) 11 Block Education Officer, Block- Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari C.G. 12 Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Dondi Lohara, District Balod (C.G.) 13 Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Gurur, District Balod (C.G.) 14 Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Shri Pramod Ramteke, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Shri T.S. Sahu, P.L. (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) 4 / 5 Order on Board 28/04/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners are seeking direction towards the respondent/ authorities for grant of Kramonnati Vetanman on completion of 10 years of service in view of the order passed by Division Bench of this High Court in WA No. 261/2023 on 28.02.2024 and also as per circular dated 10.03.2017. issued by the State Government of C.G. 2. The claim of the petitioners is with regard to grant of Kramonnati Vetanman. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that with regard to award of Kramonnati Vetanman some circular has also been issued by the respondent-State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No. 261 of 2023 has also consider the identical issue. Petitioners are also entitle for Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present, this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to the competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 dated 28/02/2024. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and the documents. 5 / 5 5. Against the order passed in WA No. 261 of 2023, the State preferred a review petition bearing REVP No. 147 of 2024, which was considered and rejected by a detailed order. There against the State filed an SLP before the Supreme Court bearing SLP (C) No. 58525 of 2024, which was dismissed by order dated 17.03.2025. 6. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioners, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to competent authority annexing all relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No. 261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 4 months from the date of receipt of such representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, it is for the competent authority to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 7. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Jyoti