HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 740 of 2014 With - WRIT - B No. - 917 of 2014 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard Sri Karuna Shanker Rastogi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Dev Prakash Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the private respondents. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there are two writ petitions and parties to the same have already settled their disputes. He further submits that since the parties have already settled their disputes, they do not want to press the petitions and application for withdrawal of the writ petition has already been moved alongwith an Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : S.K.Maurya, B.Q.Siddequi, Karuna Shanker Rastogi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dev Prakash Singh Chauhan Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : K.S.Rastogi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., D.P.S.Chauhan, Dev Prakash Singh, Laxmi Mohan Khare, Naresh Kumar Pathak Bateshwar Singh .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director Of Consolidation Sitapur And Anr. .....Respondent(s) Jagram Singh .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director Of Consolidation Sitapur Camp At Kheri And Ors .....Respondent(s) application for substitution. Sri Dev Prakash Singh Chauhan, learned counsel appearing for the private respondents also does not dispute the same. He further submits that he has no objection insofar as substitution is concerned. Accordingly, in view of the aforesaid, application for substitution as well as the application for withdrawal of the writ petition, are allowed. As a consequence, learned counsel for the petitioner shall carry out the necessary amendments in the memo of the petition itself during course of the day. Thereafter, the matter shall be consigned to records. October 10, 2025 A.Nigam WRIB No. 740 of 2014 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench