HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5621 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the charge-sheet has also been submitted against the petitioner and as such, the instant writ petition has rendered infructuous. 3. Learned AGA for the State could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with the liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage. November 17, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satendra Kumar (Singh), Abhishek Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Govind Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench