Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19519 (KAR)

SRI MARAPPA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/8082/2025 · 2025-04-24

N S Sanjay Gowda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:17116 WP No. 8082 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 8082 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI MARAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS S/O PUTTANNA R/AT -MAHADEVAKODIGEHALLI VILLAGE, JALAHOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT PIN CODE 562 149 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVI PRAKASH V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLPUR SUB DIVISION CHIKKABALLAPUR PIN CODE 562 101 3. THE TAHSILDHAR SIDLAHATTA TALUK SIDLAGHATTA, PIN CODE 562 105 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.MANJUNATH., HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO TRANSFER THE KATHA IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER AS PER VIDE ORDER DATED 15.12.2023 AND Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:17116 WP No. 8082 of 2025 01.02.2024 ORDERS PASSED BY R2 VIDE ANNX-B AND C TO THIS WP WITHIN TIME BOUND. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. In this petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondent – authorities to transfer the khatha in his name as per the order dated 15.12.2023 and 01.02.2024. 2. Learned AGA files a memo dated 24.04.2025 enclosing the copy of the order dated 08.10.2024 passed by the Tahsildar and submits that the appeal filed by the petitioner in R.A.(D).C.R.49/2024 has been disposed of vide order dated 08.10.2024 and therefore, the present petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. In view of the above submission, the prayer in this writ petition does not survive for consideration. The writ petition is therefore dismissed. However, liberty - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:17116 WP No. 8082 of 2025 is reserved to the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid order. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE PKS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 142