Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19518 (AP)

M GOVERDHAN v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/13420/2025 · 2025-05-14

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITIONNO: 13420 OF 2025 Between: M Goverdhan, S/o Naganna Goud, Aged 51 years, Occ Business, Resident of D.No. 15/492, Gosha Hospital, Adoni- 518301, Kurnool District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Home, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Amaravathi. 2. The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, beside Konda Reddy, Burju, Kurnool District; Andhra Pradesh - 518 001 3. The Station House Officer, Kowthalam Police Station, Kowthalam, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh - 518 344, 4. The Authorized Officer, KARNATAKA BANK LIMITED, Asset Recovery Management Branch, I Floor, Plot No.50, Srinagar Colony, Road No.3, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500 073. 5. The Chief Branch Manager- Karnataka Bank Limited, Rajasri Complex Railway Station Road, Adoni, Kurnool Dist, Andhra Pradesh. 6. Mittikiri Ramapullaiah, H.No-9-171/2, Baba Gardens, Lions Club Colony, Arts College Road, Adoni-518 301, Kurnool District. " 4k 7. Mr. D. Mahaboob Basha, S/o Abdul Basith, R/o D. No. 1/55. LIG. Adoni- 518 301. ...RESPONDENTS ... A * • 7- Petition under Article 226 of-the Constitution of India praying that in ^ the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction . .4. more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, in declaring the high handed action of the Respondent no.3 not to dispossess the petitioner from the extent of bearing Survey Number.222/A Admeasuring 121891.95 Sft 13543.55 square yards situated at Urukunda Village, Kowthalam Mandalam, Adhoni division Kurnool District or not to extend any support to Respondent No.6 and 7 to interfere in' physical possession and as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and violative of Article 14, 19 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents more particularly Respondent no.3 not to dispossess the petitioner from the extent of bearing Survey Number.222/A Admeasuring 121891.95 Sft or 13543.55 square yards situated at Urukunda Village, Kowthalam Mandalam, Adhoni division Kurnool District. or J lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 not to dispossess the petitioner from the extent of bearing Survey Number.222/A Measuring 121891.95 Sft 13543.55 square yards situated at Urukunda Village, Kowthalam Mandalam, Adhoni division Kurnool District or not to extend any support to Respondent No.6 & 7 to interfere in physical possession of Petitioner pending disposal of the main case in the interest of justice. or I I .1 e- '5-' v'; Si-S-. /v: ■> i Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. K VENKATA SUBBAIAH V Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 7: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER 1 (Dr.YLRJ W.P.No.13420 of 2025) / APHC010274472025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 13420/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER M Goverdhan AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K VENKATA SUBBAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER:- rd This writ petition has been filed alleging that the 3 respondent-station House Officer, Kowthalam Police Station, Kurnool District, is interfering in civil disputes. Accordingly, a direction is \ ■'X 2 (Dr.YLRJ W.P.No.13420 of 2025) sought contending that such interference i unjust. s, \ illegal, arbitrary, and IS 2. Heard Sri K. Venkata Subbaiah, learned counsel petitioner, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. for the for Home, 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for has produced a copy of the instructions issued Police, Kowthalam Urban Police Station Home by the Inspector of stating that the police not interfering in the civil disputes involving the petitioner. are 4. Indeed, the police are not authorized to interfere disputes between private parties. In the the police in relation to a civil dispute, the police advise them to approach the appropriate civil Court. in civil event any party approaches are expected to 5. Since the 3'"' respondent has submitted instructions in the form of a letter stating that he is not interfering in the civil disputes, no cause of action Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. survives in the present writ petition. 6. Recording the said observation, the Writ Petition iIS closed. \ 3 (Dr.YLRJ W.P.No.l3420of 2025) No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K J RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// I?" OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. K Venkata Subbaiah Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP For Home ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. THREE CD Copies AL V HIGH COURT DATED:15/05/2025 VACATION COURT ORDER WP.No.13420 of 2025 « zn MAY 2025 'V# «»ecuon . 1% CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS