APHC010273912003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18124/2003 Between: 1. T. CHANDRA REDDY, CHITTOOR DISTRICT., S/O T. VENKATAMUNI REDDY, WORKING AS HELPER, RADIO & BROADCASTING SECTION, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER CHITTOOR DISTRICT, TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. A V V KRISHNA PRASAD, WORKING AS ASSISTANT TECHNICIAN GRADE-II, RADIO & BROAD CASTING SECTION, TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATI, 3. THE SPECIAL GRADE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER GENERAL, TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned order of the 1st Respondent dated 18-7-2003 vide his ROC. NO.TL8/48584/93, as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to law and opposed to the judgment dated 8-1-2003 in WP No.5871/1996 and consequently direct the 1st Respondent herein to promote the petitioner to the post of Assistant Technician Grade II with retrospective effect with all consequential benefits thereto, forthwith; and IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 22550 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the1st respondent herein promote the petitioner to the post of Assistant Technician Grade II, not with standing with the impugned order of the 1st Respondent dated 18-7-2003 vide his ROC No.TL8/48584/93 immediately, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition IA NO: 2 OF 2003(WPMP 33970 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the above writ petition by fixing up on an early date of hearing preferably within 4 weeks from today, in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T BALAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. AMRUTHA BOPPUDI 2. C SRINIVASA BABA The Court made the following order: Sri T.Balaji, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in this writ petition no longer survives and this writ petition became infructuous and hence prayed to dismiss the writ petition. 2. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS