ASHUTOSH PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/1034/2025 · 2025-12-08
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195145 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 195145 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 1034 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.
2. The applicant has approached this Court for getting a direction issued to the court concerned to decide Complaint Case No.883 of 2019, Ashutosh Pandey Vs. Ranveer Singh, under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur within a stipulated period as the same has been pending since 2019.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that under Section 143(3) of the N.I. Act, it is provided that every trial under this Section shall be conducted as expeditiously as possible and endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial within six months from the date of filing of the complaint. He has submitted that since long time, the case is pending without substantial progress.
4. In view of the aforesaid facts, the court concerned is directed to adhere to the provisions of Section 143(3) of the N.I. Act and shall act accordingly and decide the aforesaid case expeditiously in accordance with law within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before the court concerned.
5. This application stands disposed of. December 8, 2025 Rao/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jitendra Kumar Pandey, Ankit Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Ashutosh Pandey .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench