Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195142 (ALL)

ANUPAM SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/8952/2025 · 2025-10-07

Abdul Moin, Babita Rani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8952 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. In pursuance to the order of this Court dated 19.09.2025, Sri Gyanendra Singh, Sub Inspector (Investigation Officer) Police Station- Bijnaur District Lucknow is present in the Court. 2. Heard. 3. Learned AGA states that on account of Station House Officer Police Station- Bijnaur District- Lucknow having fallen ill, the personal affidavit could not be filed. 4. Despite a notice being issued to the respondent no. 4, neither notice has been received back nor any Vakalatnama has been filed till date. 5. However, as the matter is too trivial to keep pending before this Court, the same is being decided. 5. Instant petition has been filed praying for quashing of the First Information Report dated 07.08.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 0241 of 2025 under Sections 281, 125 (b), 324 (2) of BNS at Police Station- Bijnaur District Lucknow, a copy of which is annexure 1 to the writ petition. 6. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite all the offences under which the First Information Report has been lodged carry a sentence of less than seven years and the petitioner is being repeatedly Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sheikh Mohammad Ali Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Anupam Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) harassed by the police by repeatedly calling him at the police station for recording of his statement. 7. Responding, learned AGA on the basis of instructions given by the Investigation Officer who is present in Court states that it is only the statement of the petitioner which is to be recorded. He further states that the petitioner may present himself for recording of his statement on a particular date and his statement would be recorded and that the petitioner should cooperate in the investigation. 8. Responding learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be going for recording of his statement on 10.10.2025 at 1100 AM and that he would cooperate in the investigation. 9. The aforesaid statements are recorded and the petition is disposed of. October 7, 2025 Pachhere/- CRLP No. 8952 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench