Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 195141 (ALL)

RAM NARAYAN v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DAIRY DEV. DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/15216/2025 · 2025-12-19

Shree Prakash Singh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15216 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Pankaj Patel learned counsel for the respondent no.3. Present petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "1. Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party No-2&3 to ensure payment of admitted post retiral dues as well as bonus/increments of four years along with admissible interest to the petitioner within stipulated, in the interest of justice. 2. Issue a writ or order in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party No-2 i.e. Milk Commissioner, Dairy Development Department UP Jawahar Bhawan Lucknow to consider and decide the claim of petitioner with regard to payment of post dues as well as bonus/increments of last four years within stipulated period. in the interest of justice." Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3 within fifteen days and direct the respondent no.3 to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, Jainendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Patel Ram Narayan .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dairy Dev. Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3/General Manager, Gonda Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.3 is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within further period of eight weeks. Needless to say that if the petitioner is entitled for the payment, the same shall be disbursed by the respondents. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. December 19, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 15216 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench