SMT. PUSHPA POUNIKAR (Pushpa Limje before marriage) v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPS/3027/2025 · 2025-05-01
Shri Bibhu Datta Guru
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19514 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19514 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:19827
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3027 of 2025 1 - Smt. Pushpa Pounikar (Pushpa Limje Before Marriage) W/o Shri Om Prakash Pounikar Aged About 46 Years Working As Personal Assistant / Stenographer At Law Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, R/o Q.No. F3 A, 201, Sector -27, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Law And Legislative Affairs, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur,
Chhattisgarh. 2 - Secretary Department Of Finance, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vivek Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiyan, Dy. G.A.
Hon'ble Shri
Bibhu Datta Guru
, Judge
Order on Board 01/05/2025
1. By the present petition, the petitioner, who is presently working as Stenographer(Hindi) in the Department of Law, C.G. preferred the present writ petition seeking a direction towards the respondents for AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2025.05.02 18:07:18 +0530
2 payment of salary on the pay scale provided as per the sanctioned set-up dated 29/01/2002, 08/08/2008 and 21/07/2009.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted representation to the respondent authorities with a request for payment of the pay scale as per the sanctioned set-up, however, till date, the same has not been decided. He further submits that the writ petition be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondents by filing a fresh representation claiming the proper pay scale as per the sanctioned set-up of the State Government.
3.
Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Looking to the submission made by learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondent No.1 for payment of salary as per the sanctioned set-up of the State Government within a period of 15 days and if the petitioner will file such representation, the respondents are directed to decide the representation filed by the petitioner within a period of 90 days from today, in accordance with law.
5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands
disposed of. SD/-
(Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Amardeep