- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22377 WP No. 6795 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 6795 OF 2025 (C) BETWEEN: M/S. COORG CINEPLEX REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.303, "VAIBHAVA NILAYA", KUVEMPU BADAWANE, MULLUSOGE VILLAGE, KUSHALANAGAR HOBLI, SOMWARPET TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SHRI. U.R.UMESH S/O U.T.RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/AT NO.701, BASAVESHWARA BADAWANE, MULLUSOGE VILLAGE, KUSHALANAGAR TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT-571 234. (THE FIRM IS REGISTERED UNDER INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT 1932). …PETITIONER (BY SRI. YATNAL PARASAPPA GURAPPA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHRI. K.J.NAGENDRA GUPTHA S/O LATE JEJANNA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, 2. SHRI. NITHIN.G.GUPTA S/O NAGENDRA GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 3. SHRI. ARJUN.N.GUPTA S/O NAGENDRA GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22377 WP No. 6795 of 2025 RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT "EKADANTA", OPPOSITE GOWDA SAMAJA, CHUDEGOWDA EXTENSION, 4TH BLOCK, KUSHALANAGAR TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT-571 234. 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-CUM DISTRICT MAGISTRATE MADIKERI, KODAGU DISTRICT-571 201. 5. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MADIKERI SUB-DIVISION, MADIKERI, KODAGU DISTRICT-571 201. 6. THE TAHASILDAR KUSHALANAGAR, KUSHALANAGARA TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT-571 234. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SYED AHMED., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. RAJAKUMAR.M., AGA FOR R4 TO 6; NOTICE TO R1 TO 3-DISPENSED WITH V/O DATED:10.03.2025) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Yatnal Parasappa Gurappa., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Rajakumar.M., AGA for respondents 4 to 6 have appeared in person. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22377 WP No. 6795 of 2025 Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about withdrawal of the petition. The oral submission and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24