Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19511 (GAU)

SIMARANI DEURI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS

WP(C)/6633/2018 · 2025-04-20

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010212872018 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6633/2018 SIMARANI DEURI W/O- SRI SADANANDA DEURI, R/O- VILL- PANBARI, P.S- NARAYANPUR, DIST- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REP. BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPTT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER LAKHIMPUR DISTRICT LAKHIMPUR ASSAM 3:THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (REV) LAKHIMPUR DIST- NORTH LAKHIMPUR 4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER NARAYANPUR REVENUE CIRCLE NARAYANPUR DIST- LAKHIMPUR ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J SARMAH, MR. A BHATTACHARJEE,MR. M C DAS Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE,MR. R BORPUJARI Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 21.04.2025 Heard Mr. J. Sarmah, learned counsel for the petitioner and also Ms. M. Barman, learned counsel appearing for the state respondents and Mr. J. Handique, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 After arguing the matter for sometimes Mr. Sarmah, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned authorities for allotment of a plot of land in terms of the Land Policy in vogue. The said prayer is not objected to by Ms. M. Barman, learned counsel appearing for the state respondents. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant