Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19510 (GAU)

MUNMI BAGTI v. NAYAN KUMAR

Tr.P.(C)./93/2024 · 2025-09-16

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010212862024 2025:GAU-AS:12816 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Tr.P.(C)./93/2024 MUNMI BAGTI W/O- SRI NAYAN KUMAR, D/O- SRI LAKHAN CHANDRA BAGTI, R/O- KACHARI PATHAR GAON, P.O. AND P.S. DEMOW, PIN- 785672, DIST. SIVASAGAR, ASSAM VERSUS NAYAN KUMAR S/O- SRI BISHASWAR KUMAR, R/O- BISHMILE, CHABUA, P.O. AND P.S. CHABUA, PIN- 786184, DIST. DIBRUGARH, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR P KATAKI, MS S BARPUJARI,MRS R BEGUM,MS. A LALA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S SARMA, B SAHA,MR B P SARMAH,MR. R HAZARIKA,MR. C CHAKRAVARTY BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 17-09-2025 Learned counsel Ms. R. Begum is present for the petitioner, who has filed this application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for transferring T.S.(Divorce) No. 103/2024 pending in the Court of District Judge, Page No.# 2/2 Dibrugarh to the Court of District Judge, Sivsagar. 2. Mr. C. Chakravarty is present for the respondent and stated that he has no objection if the abovementioned case is transferred from Dibrugarh to Sivsagar. 3. I have considered the submissions at the bar. 4. It is submitted that it becomes difficult for the petitioner, being a woman, to travel from Sivsagar to Dibrugarh to appear in the proceeding and she is a woman with no income. 5. Considering all aspects and considering the submissions at the bar, the entire case of T.S. (Divorce) No. 103/2024 under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is transferred from the Court of District Judge, Dibrugarh to the Court of District Judge, Sivsagar. 6. In terms of the above observation, this petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant