Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19510 (AP)

Batchu Kamalavathi, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/18084/2020 · 2025-08-18

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010273902020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18084/2020 Between: 1. BATCHU KAMALAVATHI,, W/O. LATE VENKATA VISWESWARA RAO, AGED 70 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O D. NO 2-76, RAMALAYAM STREET, A. POLAVARAM VILLAGE, JANGAREDDY GUDEM MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, JANGAREDDY GUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT., 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, JANGAREDDYGUDEM POLICE STATION, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JANGAREDDYGUDEM POLICE STATION, JANGAREDDYGUDEM VILLAGE AND MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. PALADUGU VENKATA SURESH, S/O LATE SURYANARAYANA, AGED 33 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION RIO KOTHA COLONY, DARBHAGUDEM VILLAGE, JEELUGUMILLI MANDAL, WEST 2 GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents 2 to 5, at the instance of 6th respondent in repeatedly insisting the petitioner to appear before their authority, yield and settle to the terms of 6th respondent and vacate from a part of about Ac. 0.30 Cents out of her total Agricultural Landed property of Ac. 3.80 Cents covered by Sy. No 286/2 of Ayyagari Polavaram Village, Jangareddygudem Mandal in West Godavari District, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with her personal life, liberty and property in any manner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents particularly respondents 3 to 5 not to interfere in any manner with the petitioner’s personal life, liberty and Agricultural Landed property of Ac. 0.30 Cents covered by Sy. 0.30 Cents covered by Sy. No: 286/2 of Ayyagari Polavaram Revenue Village, Jangareddy Gudem Mandal in West Godavari District, pending disposal of main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents 2 to 5, at the instance of 6th respondent in repeatedly insisting the petitioner to appear before their authority, yield and settle to the terms of 6th respondent and vacate from a part of about Ac. 0.30 Cents out of her total Agricultural Landed property of Ac. 3.80 Cents covered by Sy. No 286/2 of Ayyagari Polavaram Village, Jangareddygudem Mandal in West Godavari District, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with her personal life, liberty and property in any manner and pass...…” 2. Heard Ms.Nimmagadda Revathi, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are interfering in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil dispute. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes. No order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 19.08.2025 MH 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 72 W.P.No.18084 of 2020 Dated.19.08.2025 MH